Forum
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsGeneralGeneralRule questionRule question
Previous
 
Next
New Post
2/16/2010 10:41 AM
 
I don't know a whole lot about the hockey rules so perhaps someone could answer a question for me.
When a defensive player is clearly down on the ice with an injury does the offense get to keep on playing until they get to take a shot or should the whistle be blown and play stopped?
 
New Post
2/16/2010 11:36 AM
 
If you are referring to the injury in the last minute of the Cinnaminson/Holy Cross game that occurred just before Holy Cross' goal, then no, the whistle should not have been blown. In that situation, the decision to stop play when the offensive team is in control of the play with a defensive player down is at the referee's discretion. As a certified ref, this was once brought up at a seminar I attended. In order for play to be stopped in the offensive zone, the team with the injured player must gain possession of the puck, much like a delayed penalty. Had the player clearly been in serious pain, with visible bleeding, broken bones, or unconsciousness, then the referee would have stopped play. Since the injury did not appear to be anything more serious than an injury as a result of a blocked shot, the referee was correct by not stopping play. This rule is in effect to keep a defensive player to drop to the ice while the offensive team is pressuring, in order to get a stop of play and potentially end a scoring chance. I am not saying that the Cinnaminson defenseman was down solely to bring a stop to play and cease Holy Cross' scoring attempt, but from a referee's eyes, the injury was not serious enough to deem it necessary to end play immediately.
 
New Post
2/16/2010 12:15 PM
 
Thanks - that makes sense.
 
New Post
2/17/2010 10:36 AM
 

Cinnaminson did play the puck and the whistle should have been blown.

 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsGeneralGeneralRule questionRule question